Affilka vs MyAffiliates: Comparing Affiliate Software for iGaming Operators
Compare Affilka and MyAffiliates on commission flexibility, reporting, payments and programme management, with guidance for new and established iGaming operators.
Affilka deserves consideration when integrated payment methods and detailed player-qualification rules are priorities. MyAffiliates is relevant when an operator needs commissions based on custom data fields or established media integrations. Both support multiple gaming brands, so brand consolidation alone provides little basis for choosing between them.
The more useful comparison concerns the work behind the programme. Your team needs to translate affiliate agreements into calculations, explain the resulting balances and distribute the right campaign materials.
For an existing programme, those requirements also determine how much configuration must be preserved during migration. A new operator can use them to establish a workable setup before recruiting affiliates.
How Do Affilka and MyAffiliates Compare?
Affilka combines iGaming programme administration with named payment integrations. MyAffiliates documents a formula-based commission engine and configurable reporting, supported by integrations with media providers. Both offer substantial customisation, although the implementation should demonstrate how that flexibility applies to your programme.
| Requirement | Affilka | MyAffiliates |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial model | Fixed monthly tiers; no setup fee advertised | One-time setup fee and fixed monthly subscription |
| Published starting price | €2,500/month through authorised reseller SOFTSWISS | Quote required |
| Multiple brands | Unified affiliate programme | Brands and products under one system |
| Commission configuration | Conditional rewards and custom plans | Formula-based plans using supplied data fields |
| Reporting access | Reports API | XML API and configurable reports |
| Media management | Partner-specific creatives and landing pages | Media feeds and third-party provider integrations |
| Payments | Named integrated methods and external processing options | Payment reporting and integration options; confirm execution setup |
| Programme customisation | Frontend API | Configurable interface and terminology |
The Affilka product overview describes its multi-brand administration and payment offering. MyAffiliates presents a shared system for an operator’s gaming brands and products.
How Much Do Affilka and MyAffiliates Cost?
Affilka has a published starting subscription through SOFTSWISS and advertises no setup fee. MyAffiliates charges for initial setup, followed by a fixed monthly subscription. Without a MyAffiliates quote for the same requirements, the available information does not establish which platform has the lower total cost.
SOFTSWISS lists Affilka from €2,500 per month. Its commercial offering includes multi-brand arrangements.
The MyAffiliates pricing description states that the setup fee covers integration and migration where needed. Training and support are included.
| Cost consideration | Affilka | MyAffiliates |
|---|---|---|
| Starting subscription | €2,500/month through SOFTSWISS | Numerical price not published on the reviewed pages |
| Setup | No setup fee advertised | One-time fee |
| Migration | Agree the required scope | Included within the described setup offering |
| Additional brands | Multi-brand commercial arrangements | Establish the contracted scope |
| Training and support | Confirm service terms | Unlimited training and support advertised |
For a first-year comparison, include the setup charge alongside twelve months of subscription fees. Payment-provider charges and any separately scoped work also belong in the budget.
An established operator should consider the cost of reproducing existing agreements. A quote is more useful when it includes the unusual deals that currently require manual intervention.
Which Platform Handles Non-Standard Commission Deals?
Both platforms support custom agreements. Affilka publishes detailed qualification and carryover controls. MyAffiliates explicitly describes formulas that can use any data field supplied by the operator, making it relevant where commissions depend on business-specific inputs.
Affilka’s commission constructor supports deposit and wagering conditions, with full, partial or forgiven negative carryover.
MyAffiliates commission plans include qualified CPA and country-specific rates. The provider also accepts requests for non-standard models.
| Agreement requirement | Affilka | MyAffiliates |
|---|---|---|
| CPA qualification | Deposit and wagering criteria | Qualified CPA based on specified player actions |
| Geographic terms | Country-specific rules | Country-specific CPA |
| Bespoke calculation | Custom reward algorithms | Formulas using supplied data fields |
| Negative carryover | Several approaches documented | Confirm the required treatment |
| Sub-affiliate structure | Unlimited tiers documented | Unlimited tiers documented |
MyAffiliates’ formula approach is useful when the operator already calculates a proprietary value in its backend. The implementation still needs to establish when that value arrives and what happens if it is corrected.
For either platform, test a deal whose inputs change after the reporting period closes. The expected treatment should be visible in the resulting commission and understandable to the affiliate manager.
How Can Managers Investigate Player Qualification?
MyAffiliates publishes specific customer-management tools for examining qualification and changing assignments. Affilka combines player reporting with eligibility rules. These capabilities matter when a partner disputes a CPA payment or a customer has been assigned incorrectly.
The MyAffiliates customer-management documentation describes individual dashboards with CPA qualification details. Operators can inspect the referring source and landing page, reassign customers to another plan or affiliate, and manage records in bulk.
Affilka can exclude duplicate or self-excluded players from reward calculations and supports player-level analysis.
Consider a player who registered through one campaign but appears under another affiliate’s agreement. The team needs enough history to identify the cause and understand the financial effect of a correction.
A reassignment feature is useful only when the operator also understands how it affects historical rewards. That behaviour should be demonstrated before migration or launch.
Which Platform Provides More Useful Reporting?
Both platforms offer configurable reports and programmatic access. Affilka has a dedicated Reports API and documented cohort analysis. MyAffiliates describes customisable report columns and scheduled data transfers, with XML API access for connected systems.
The Affilka Reports API lets operators and partners retrieve reporting data without relying exclusively on the dashboard.
MyAffiliates advanced reporting covers customer performance and payment information, alongside fraud-related and audit reports. It also offers custom report development and bespoke XML API endpoints on request.
| Reporting requirement | Affilka | MyAffiliates |
|---|---|---|
| Player analysis | Player reports and cohort segmentation | Customer reporting with configurable filters |
| External access | Reports API | XML API |
| Affiliate-facing data | Configurable visibility | Reports tailored to assigned commission plans |
| Bespoke reporting | Assess available API data against the requirement | Custom reports and endpoints available on request |
A useful report should connect acquisition costs with subsequent player value. High first-deposit volume can justify an initial conversation with an affiliate, but longer-term revenue provides a better basis for changing commercial terms.
For teams with an existing business-intelligence system, the API evaluation should use a report they already depend on. This shows whether the required fields are available without rebuilding the analysis around the software.
How Current Is the Reporting Data?
The published timing descriptions are not precise enough to establish a universal speed winner. SOFTSWISS describes a configurable 15-minute synchronisation interval for Affilka. MyAffiliates uses “close-to-real-time” reporting language on its homepage without giving an equivalent numerical interval.
Affilka’s synchronisation description concerns data exchange with the gaming platform. MyAffiliates’ platform overview describes its reporting approach more broadly.
During a demonstration, follow a deposit from the gaming backend into the operator report and affiliate account. That measurement is more informative than comparing labels attached to different stages of processing.
The same test should include a corrected event. Fresh data is useful only if later adjustments also reach the reports used to calculate rewards.
How Do the Platforms Handle Campaign Materials?
MyAffiliates has a documented advantage for teams already using Bannerflow or Connextra because it names those integrations. Affilka supports assigning creatives and landing pages to selected partners. The relevant distinction is how campaign materials enter the system and reach the intended affiliates.
MyAffiliates media management supports manual uploads and bulk FTP uploads, with automated imports through XML feeds. Materials can be assigned to individual affiliates or groups.
Affilka lets operators make media public or restrict it to specific partners.
| Campaign workflow | Affilka | MyAffiliates |
|---|---|---|
| Partner-specific materials | Supported | Supported |
| Landing pages | Can be assigned to affiliates | Assess the required campaign setup |
| Named media-provider integrations | Confirm compatibility | Bannerflow and Connextra documented |
| Bulk or automated media imports | Confirm the required method | FTP uploads and XML feeds documented |
For an operator producing many localised campaigns, the distribution process can influence daily workload. Test how a revised creative replaces an old version and how access is restricted for a partner with an exclusive offer.
How Will Finance Process Affiliate Payments?
Affilka publishes named methods for executing payments from its back office. MyAffiliates documents payment reports and XML API integration with payment gateways, but the reviewed pages do not provide an equivalent list of supported payout providers. Buyers should establish the exact execution workflow in the proposal.
Affilka’s payment overview includes Neteller and Skrill, alongside Cryptoprocessing and bank transfer. Manual processing and a Financial API provide additional options.
The MyAffiliates reporting and integration description establishes payment-data access. It does not, by itself, establish that a particular processor is available in the proposed implementation.
| Finance requirement | Affilka | MyAffiliates |
|---|---|---|
| Named payment methods | Published | Confirm provider compatibility |
| External integration | Financial API and manual options | XML API integration described |
| Reporting | Affiliate balances and payment controls | Payment reports and configurable outputs |
| Main implementation question | Which merchant accounts and methods will be used? | How will approved commissions reach the payment provider? |
Affilka may be a more direct fit when its listed methods already cover the affiliate base. MyAffiliates needs a demonstrated integration where finance intends to retain an existing payment provider.
What Support and Migration Work Are Included?
MyAffiliates explicitly includes integration and migration within its setup offering and advertises round-the-clock support. Affilka publishes a migration checklist and advertises ongoing support through its reseller. Neither description establishes a guaranteed migration duration for every programme.
The MyAffiliates service description identifies support teams in Australia and Malta, with an emergency contact route and prioritised handling of critical issues.
Affilka’s migration checklist covers data mapping and commission configuration. It also addresses affiliate communication when referral links must change.
For an established programme, agree how opening balances and player attribution will be checked. The required historical data should be selected before the transfer begins.
New programmes have fewer migration dependencies, but still need training around exceptions. The team should know how to investigate a disputed reward and correct an agreement without losing the explanation for the change.
When Is Trackdesk Worth Considering?
Trackdesk is worth evaluating when defined package allowances and automation through existing AI tools are priorities. Its iGaming pricing lists Slot at $1,499 per month for one brand and Jackpot at $1,999 per month for up to ten brands, with a requested 14-day trial.
The Trackdesk MCP integration supports live data queries and authorised actions through compatible AI clients. Teams can investigate performance and perform supported updates using the connected account’s permissions.
That makes Trackdesk our recommended alternative when reducing recurring administration is a central buying requirement. A mandatory media integration or unusual commission formula should still be demonstrated before selection.
Which Platform Should You Choose?
Affilka deserves priority when its named payment methods and qualification controls closely match the programme. It also offers a published starting price for buyers establishing an initial budget.
MyAffiliates is relevant when custom data fields drive commission formulas or the team already depends on its documented media integrations. Its setup charge needs to be included in the comparison, and payment execution should be confirmed before committing.
Trackdesk belongs on the shortlist when the operator wants visible multi-brand allowances and connected automation. Use a representative agreement and a complete payment cycle to compare the proposed implementations, including the work your team will still perform manually.
Hi! I'm Bohdan, Content Manager at Trackdesk. I write about affiliate marketing, tracking, and partner programs — breaking down complex topics into something you can actually use — and I'm the voice behind Trackdesk's social media, from platform updates to industry news. Wherever you find us, the goal is the same: answers that are easy to find and easy to apply.
