MyAffiliates vs Income Access: Comparing Affiliate Software for iGaming Operators
Compare MyAffiliates and Income Access on commission flexibility, reporting and payments, including setup costs and the services available to support programme growth.
MyAffiliates and Income Access serve iGaming operators with different approaches to running an affiliate programme. MyAffiliates emphasises software customisation, including commission formulas and the affiliate interface. Income Access offers a platform alongside an affiliate network and optional programme management services.
An established affiliate team may place the greatest value on configuring its existing agreements accurately. A new operator may also need help recruiting partners and developing those relationships. Both requirements matter, but they should be assessed separately when comparing the vendors.
Neither publishes a standard numerical subscription price on the reviewed pages. MyAffiliates does disclose an initial setup fee, making implementation cost an explicit part of the purchasing decision.
How do MyAffiliates and Income Access compare?
MyAffiliates provides detailed information about custom commission calculations and interface controls. Income Access documents player-level analysis and offers services that extend into operating the programme.
| Area | MyAffiliates | Income Access |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Setup fee followed by a monthly fee | No standard numerical subscription price on the reviewed product pages |
| Commission configuration | Formulas using operator-supplied data fields | Custom compensation and campaign-specific structures |
| Reporting | Custom reports and customer dashboards | Player-level reporting and customer journey analysis |
| Affiliate interface | Configurable layout and terminology | Branding and market-specific settings |
| Payments | Invoicing and payout quarantine | Integrated payment tool and network payment processing |
| Programme support | Software support and training | Optional recruitment and managed affiliate services |
| Implementation | Average integration estimate of four to six weeks for a well-coordinated team | Migration plan developed during scoping |
The service distinction affects how the proposals should be compared. Assistance with platform configuration is different from having a provider recruit affiliates and manage ongoing relationships.
How much do MyAffiliates and Income Access cost?
Both require a custom commercial discussion. MyAffiliates explains its setup and recurring charges, while Income Access directs buyers through a demo and scoping process.
MyAffiliates describes its pricing as an initial integration fee, including migration where needed, followed by a monthly fee. Its pricing FAQ specifies that half the setup fee is due at signing and the remainder at go-live.
Income Access’s software page does not publish a standard subscription amount.
| Cost consideration | MyAffiliates | Income Access |
|---|---|---|
| Published monthly amount | Not stated | Not stated |
| Initial setup charge | Explicitly stated | Establish in the proposal |
| Setup payment schedule | 50% at signing, 50% at go-live | Establish in the proposal |
| Additional service scope | Confirm any bespoke development requirements | Identify network and management services separately |
MyAffiliates also says newly developed functionality is included without additional module purchases. That policy helps clarify feature access, although it does not establish the cost of every custom development request.
For Income Access, separate software costs from operational services. A proposal that includes recruitment covers work your own staff would otherwise perform, so its total cannot be assessed as a licence fee alone.
Which platform fits complex commission agreements?
Both support customised compensation. MyAffiliates publishes more detail about formula-based calculations, while Income Access documents custom models and commission structures attached to campaign IDs.
The MyAffiliates commission engine can use data fields supplied by the operator. Its documented models include qualified CPA and progressive revenue share, with non-standard plans available on request.
Income Access supports campaign-specific compensation. Its network commission module lists CPA and revenue share, alongside CPI and CPL.
| Agreement requirement | MyAffiliates | Income Access |
|---|---|---|
| Custom calculation | Formulas based on received data fields | Custom compensation models |
| Player qualification | Qualified CPA based on specified actions | Confirm the required qualification logic |
| Geographic terms | Country-specific CPA | Confirm the proposed market configuration |
| Sub-affiliate structure | Unlimited sub-affiliate tiers | Referral tracking and compensation are documented |
| Campaign-specific compensation | Custom partner plans | Commission structures linked to campaign IDs |
The documentation gives buyers different levels of detail. An unpublished rule should not be treated as an unavailable capability.
An operator using bespoke agreements should evaluate a complete calculation, including the qualifying action and any subsequent adjustment. This shows whether the platform can handle the contract without recurring manual corrections.
What can managers learn from the reporting?
Both platforms offer customer-level visibility and configurable reports. MyAffiliates documents qualification details that can help explain individual CPA decisions. Income Access describes analysis from the initial referral through the player’s lifetime revenue.
MyAffiliates’ customer dashboards include CPA qualification information and referral details. Its advanced reporting supports custom reports, with affiliate-facing information tailored to assigned commission plans.
Income Access provides player-level reporting and customer journey analysis, supported by custom parameters.
These views help answer different operational questions. An affiliate manager investigating unpaid CPA needs the qualification evidence. A manager deciding where to increase acquisition spend needs to understand the value produced by referred players over time.
The platform should support both investigations without requiring staff to reconstruct the answer from several unrelated exports.
How much can you customise the affiliate experience?
Both vendors allow operators to adapt the platform to their programme. MyAffiliates describes detailed control over the interface, while Income Access documents branding and localisation settings.
MyAffiliates’ affiliate interface options include changes to layout and terminology. Operators can also control how information is displayed.
Income Access’s configuration options cover branding and settings for different languages, markets and currencies.
For a programme serving several markets, these controls should make the agreement easier to understand. Affiliates need to recognise the relevant campaign and interpret the earnings associated with it.
During evaluation, use the questions partners regularly send to your team. The interface is doing useful work when an affiliate can find those answers without opening a support request.
How do tracking and integrations compare?
Both support server-to-server communication and custom tracking information. MyAffiliates also names mobile attribution compatibility, while Income Access describes its event relay as near real-time.
The MyAffiliates feature FAQ lists S2S postbacks with custom parameters and compatibility with AppsFlyer and Branch.
Income Access’s product features include S2S Event Relay and tracking across online and offline channels. Its event relay documentation explains that affiliates establish an endpoint to receive tagged events.
For mobile acquisition, follow the player from the referral to the event that qualifies for commission. The connection needs to preserve the identifiers and values used in your agreement.
Reporting updates and postback delivery should also be assessed separately. A notification reaching the affiliate does not establish when the corresponding financial calculation is final.
How are affiliate payments handled?
MyAffiliates documents financial controls within the platform. Income Access offers payment functionality and describes monthly processing as part of its network service.
MyAffiliates lists invoicing and payout quarantine, together with custom deductions and daily currency conversion.
The Income Access Network describes processing monthly affiliate payments. Its software also includes an integrated payment tool.
| Finance requirement | MyAffiliates | Income Access |
|---|---|---|
| Preparing amounts for payment | Invoicing and payment reports | Integrated payment functionality |
| Reviewing questionable amounts | Payout quarantine | Establish the review process for the deployment |
| Adjustments | Custom fees and deductions | Confirm the required adjustment workflow |
| Provider involvement | Platform controls support the operator’s process | Monthly processing is described for the network service |
The useful comparison follows an approved commission through to reconciliation. Finance should be able to identify why an amount was held and how a later correction changes the balance.
Operators seeking help administering payments should also define which tasks the provider will perform. Software capability alone does not establish who owns the work.
Can either provider help recruit and manage affiliates?
Income Access explicitly offers managed affiliate services and network access. MyAffiliates’ reviewed materials focus on software support and training.
Through its affiliate management service, Income Access provides a dedicated manager who can help with strategy and partner recruitment. The Income Access Network offers another route to connecting with affiliates.
MyAffiliates describes support teams in Australia and Malta, with training included. This supports platform use but should not be assumed to include running the operator’s affiliate relationships.
For a new programme, external recruitment support may address an immediate staffing gap. An experienced team may have less need for that service and place greater weight on software configuration.
Network access should be evaluated against the markets you want to reach. Productive partnerships still depend on suitable commercial terms and consistent account management.
What tools support account oversight?
MyAffiliates documents access controls and auditing of platform changes. Income Access identifies Rightlander Intel as an integrated tool for assessing affiliate partners.
The MyAffiliates access-control documentation describes permissions for different users and notifications when affiliate accounts change. These controls help operators trace internal actions affecting partner records.
Income Access’s Rightlander Intel integration supports partner evaluation. Rightlander describes Intel as analysing affiliate-site content and traffic sources.
These tools address different areas of oversight. Tracing an account amendment requires an internal audit record; assessing a publisher requires evidence about its promotional activity.
Establish which information your staff will review and how findings will affect approval or payment decisions.
What should you expect during implementation?
Both vendors offer migration assistance. MyAffiliates publishes an average integration estimate, while Income Access develops a plan during scoping.
The MyAffiliates implementation FAQ gives an average of four to six weeks for a well-coordinated team. The estimate depends on the operator providing the necessary information.
Income Access describes a scoped integration and migration process without a universal completion time on the reviewed page.
For an existing programme, agree how active player relationships and unpaid commissions will be reconciled. Historical totals are insufficient if the new configuration cannot reproduce the agreements governing future earnings.
A first-time launch can focus on validating its initial tracking and compensation rules. If managed services are included, define who handles partner onboarding before the programme begins accepting traffic.
When should you consider Trackdesk?
Trackdesk is a strong alternative when you want a defined subscription and no initial setup fee.
Its published iGaming pricing lists Slot at $1,499 per month for one brand and five million monthly clicks. Jackpot costs $1,999 per month for up to ten brands and twenty million clicks. Both offer a 14-day trial on request.
Trackdesk’s MyAffiliates alternative page states that setup carries no fee and managed migration is free. It also documents player-based revenue share and partner-specific agreements.
For an operator planning to manage relationships internally, those terms provide a concrete starting point for budgeting and evaluation. The trial can be used to validate the agreements your team will administer. A requirement for outsourced programme management should be assessed separately.
Which platform should you choose?
MyAffiliates merits consideration when custom commission formulas and interface control are central requirements. Income Access is relevant when you also want help recruiting partners or managing the programme.
Compare the software against the same operating needs, then assess any additional services on their own value. Neither vendor’s public materials establish which will cost less for your deployment.
If published pricing and avoiding a setup fee are priorities, start with Trackdesk. Its defined packages provide a practical reference against which to assess the MyAffiliates and Income Access proposals.
Hi! I'm Bohdan, Content Manager at Trackdesk. I write about affiliate marketing, tracking, and partner programs — breaking down complex topics into something you can actually use — and I'm the voice behind Trackdesk's social media, from platform updates to industry news. Wherever you find us, the goal is the same: answers that are easy to find and easy to apply.
