Trackdesk vs MyAffiliates: Comparing Affiliate Software for iGaming Operators

An iGaming affiliate platform must preserve the connection between referred players, ongoing revenue and each partner’s commission agreement. Trackdesk and MyAffiliates both support configurable CPA, revenue share and hybrid arrangements. MyAffiliates uses formula-based plans built from operator-supplied data; Trackdesk maps player metrics into revenue-share calculations and sets first-time depositor qualification conditions at agreement level.

For operators comparing launch costs, Trackdesk publishes iGaming plans starting at $1,499 per month, with no setup fee and an assisted 14-day trial on Slot and Jackpot. MyAffiliates describes a custom monthly fee and generally charges an integration fee, typically split between contract signing and go-live. Total cost still requires a matched proposal covering the intended brands, traffic and implementation.

Trackdesk is a MyAffiliates alternative for teams that want programme administration through a compatible AI assistant. Its hosted MCP service can retrieve records and carry out permitted updates, such as conversion approvals. MyAffiliates BoostBox serves a different purpose: helping affiliates access brand information and promotional resources. Operators switching platforms should also verify historical data, active revenue-share relationships and commission results before cutover.

Pricing and the Cost of Getting Started

Trackdesk publishes its iGaming subscription plans, allowing operators to estimate platform costs before discussing implementation.

Trackdesk plan	Monthly price	Brands	Monthly clicks	Team seats
Slot	$1,499	1	5 million	5
Jackpot	$1,999	Up to 10	20 million	20
Full House	Custom	Custom	Custom	Uncapped

All three plans include uncapped affiliates and conversions. Slot and Jackpot offer an assisted 14-day trial, while Full House accommodates larger or bespoke deployments.

MyAffiliates describes a fixed monthly subscription with support and training included. Its commercial FAQ also specifies an integration fee, generally split equally between contract signing and go-live. The actual amounts depend on the operator’s requirements.

Include the integration charge, subscription, required capacity and ongoing support in the cost comparison. Trackdesk’s lack of a separate setup fee changes the initial commitment, but does not by itself establish a lower total cost for every deployment.

Commission Plans That Reflect Partner Agreements

MyAffiliates’ commission system uses formulas that can draw on data fields supplied by the operator. Its options include progressive RevShare and country-specific CPA. Qualified CPA can require a player to meet conditions such as a deposit threshold, and sub-affiliate structures can extend across unlimited levels.

Trackdesk’s player-based commission functionality supports RevShare calculated from mapped metrics such as NGR or deposits. Operators can configure qualification requirements at agreement level and use different terms for individual partners.

Agreement requirement	Trackdesk	MyAffiliates
Ongoing revenue commission	Player-based RevShare	Formula-based RevShare
Acquisition qualification	Agreement-level FTD thresholds	Qualified CPA
Performance tiers	Tiered commission models	Tiered and progressive models
Mixed commercial terms	Hybrid agreements	Hybrid combinations
Partner-specific arrangements	Terms configured by affiliate and offer	Plans tailored to individual affiliates

To test commission flexibility, provide one partner agreement with a deposit threshold and another with tiered RevShare. Use the same player data on both platforms and include a negative period, so the comparison covers qualification, deductions and carryover as well as the headline rate.

Player Data and Reporting

MyAffiliates provides individual customer dashboards with activity and conversion information. Operators can inspect CPA qualification details and referral sources. The system also supports customer reassignment and bulk management.

Trackdesk maps the player metrics produced by the gaming platform and preserves the affiliate relationship for ongoing attribution. That lets an operator connect the events used in its agreements to the reporting needed to assess each partnership.

MyAffiliates’ reporting tools include configurable columns and filters, with custom reports available on request.

MyAffiliates’ public materials use both “close-to-real-time” and “real-time” descriptions without establishing a consistent measured delay. Test source-event delivery, report visibility and commission availability separately before making a speed comparison.

AI Tools and Daily Programme Management

BoostBox by MyAffiliates helps affiliates obtain current product information and brand resources. It supports partners researching offers or preparing promotional content.

Trackdesk’s native MCP server connects compatible AI clients directly to programme data and supported actions. Managers can investigate performance through a live connection and carry out changes within their account permissions.

For example, a manager can retrieve the conversions behind an approval-rate change and authorise a specific supported update. BoostBox should instead be tested against affiliate questions about brands and promotional resources; those are different tasks.

Trackdesk hosts the MCP server, and its access token inherits the issuing account’s permissions. Teams therefore have a documented route to AI-assisted operations without maintaining their own MCP infrastructure.

Affiliate Experience and Recruitment

MyAffiliates offers a customisable affiliate interface. Operators can adapt its layout and terminology, manage affiliate approvals and configure access permissions. Audit records provide visibility into platform changes.

Trackdesk supports a white-label partner environment, with Jackpot including white labelling in its published package. The platform also offers private partner terms, helping managers maintain distinct agreements within the programme.

Trackdesk adds a separate source of recruitment support through its Affiliate Marketplace. Active customers can specify their offer requirements and receive matches with vetted affiliates.

Confirm the scope of matching and onboarding assistance when evaluating Marketplace. The operator still needs to agree commercial terms, support partners and review the performance of the resulting relationships.

Fraud Review and Affiliate Payments

Trackdesk’s built-in fraud engine uses 13 detection rules and displays the triggering rule alongside flagged records. Its checks cover fabricated conversions and duplicate affiliate accounts, with dedicated self-referral detection.

MyAffiliates documents fraud reporting and payout quarantine, allowing operators to control payment releases during review.

Trackdesk’s payment options include bulk payouts through Wise and Tipalti, with bank transfer and cryptocurrency options also available.

Implementation, Support and Migration

MyAffiliates’ implementation and support FAQ estimates four to six weeks for a well-coordinated implementation and describes 24/7 support and training. Timing depends on the operator’s technical and marketing teams supplying the necessary information.

Trackdesk publishes support arrangements by plan. Jackpot includes a dedicated account manager, while Full House allows a custom service arrangement. Operators can therefore select a package that reflects their support requirements.

For existing programmes, Trackdesk’s managed migration allows the previous platform to remain operational while the new configuration is validated.

The transition needs to account for active player relationships and outstanding commissions. Available exports determine which historical records can move, and commission calculations should be reconciled before cutover.

A Published Migration from MyAffiliates to Trackdesk

Trackdesk has published a case study of an iGaming operator moving from MyAffiliates. The operator is unnamed under an NDA.

The implementation addressed problems in that operator’s existing iSoft data integration and commission calculations. Trackdesk introduced event processing for the gaming data and configured negative revenue handling at commission level. The project also included a branded affiliate portal and private offer arrangements.

According to the case study, migration took approximately three weeks, followed by a month of optimisation. The affiliate network subsequently grew from 200 to almost 1,000 partners, and revenue increased by 300% within six months.

These are vendor-reported results from one unnamed deployment, not a forecast for other operators. They illustrate the integration and commission changes involved in that migration; they do not show that every MyAffiliates installation has the same issues.

Why Choose Trackdesk Over MyAffiliates?

Evaluate Trackdesk when the requirements include published entry costs, no separate setup charge and authorised programme changes through external AI tools. Compare MyAffiliates’ formula-based commissions, customer-management tools and support scope using the same player data and agreements. For an existing programme, make reconciled results a condition of cutover.

A Trackdesk demo can focus on the agreements your team needs to run and the player data behind them, giving you a concrete basis for evaluating the platform.